Turnitin

This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin.

Instructions

Week Three Learning Activity

General Instructions for Learning Activities

Read/watch all assigned materials listed for the week in the Course Content
Cite to assigned materials in all responses in Learning Activities

Use only assigned materials to complete Learning Activities; do not use the internet unless otherwise instructed
Include in-text citations and a Reference List for in-text citations
Write in correct, complete sentences, in paragraph format unless otherwise instructed

Submit Learning Activities to Assignment Folder

Tips for Formatting and Structuring Analysis:

Write in complete sentences in paragraph format.
Use in-text citations citing to relevant assignment materials.
Double-space; 12-point Arial or Times Roman font.
Introductory Sentence: Begin with an introductory sentence or very brief paragraph that states your conclusion to the questions asked.
Concluding Sentence: End the discussion with a concluding sentence or a very brief paragraph that summarizes your conclusion/what you discussed.
Support Arguments and Positions: Please refer to the module in Content, “How to Support Arguments and Positions”.

Learning Activity: due 11:59 pm ET, Saturday

Background Facts You Need To Know: TLG has scheduled another meeting with the Viral Clean (“Clean”) owners to further discuss the risks and liabilities of tort law. This meeting will focus specifically and only on product liability.

Winnie and Ralph asked you to participate in the Clean meeting and be prepared to discuss specific product liability risks related to Clean’s use and resale of EPI cleaning products. EPI is a manufacturer of environmentally friendly products.

Instructions

Report You Need To Prepare: Write a summary report addressing the following questions to use as a basis for discussion in Clean’s meeting with TLG and to educate Clean’s owners about potential risks and liabilities under product liability law. Your report must focus only on product liability law.

A: Discuss what a plaintiff would need to show using the negligence theory of product liability against Clean and compare this to what a plaintiff would need to show in a strict product liability claim against Clean for reselling EPI cleaning products.
B: Recommend specific actions that Clean could take to reduce its liabilities under negligence and strict product liability law for reselling EPI cleaning products.

DO NOT discuss the warranties liabilities Clean could face, Warranties will be addressed in the Discussion this week.

Tips for Formatting Report: The report should use the following format

REPORT

TO: Winnie James, Ralph Anders

FROM: (your name)

DATE:

RE: EPI and Clean Product Liability

Due on Feb 28, 2026 8:59 PM

Attachments

Rubric Name: BMGT 380 Learning Activities =50) – Spring 2023 ORT

Criteria	Outstanding	Above Standards	Meets Standards	Approaching or Does not meet Standards	Criterion Score
Learning Activity Analysis	30 points Demonstrates critical analysis, in-depth and comprehensive development of concepts, accurately identifies all issues and their application to facts. Shows clear evidence of having read course materials and applying them to support conclusions. Range: 27 – 30	26.9 points Demonstrates generally superior critical analysis, relatively in-depth and comprehensive development of concepts, accurately identifies most -not all – issues and their application to facts. Some evidence of having read course materials and applying them to support conclusions. Additional development and more comprehensive analysis needed. Range: 24 – 26.9	23.9 points Demonstrates some to minimal critical analysis and insight into concepts and issues, and their application to facts. Analysis is largely superficial in one/more areas and sufficient only to meet minimum requirements of learning activity with little evidence of insight and/or support for conclusions. Range: 21 – 23.9	20.9 points Does not meet minimal requirements for assignment. Little to no critical analysis, comprehensive development of concepts and issues and their application to facts. Little to no support for conclusions. Inferior in all areas. To a substantial degree, content does not reflect students own original thinking and composition. Range: 0 – 20.9	Score of Learning Activity Analysis, / 30
Writing Clarity & Mechanics	5 points Demonstrates clear, organized, specific comments presented in an easy to read style that is free of grammatical, spelling, and mechanical errors. Range: 4.5 -5	4.4 points Demonstrates generally clear, organized, specific comments with minor errors in grammar, and/or spelling, and or mechanics. Range: 4 – 4.4	3.9 points Demonstrates generally satisfactory clear, specific comments with errors in grammar, and/or spelling, and/or mechanics. Range: 3.5 – 3.9	3.4 points Presentation lacks organization, clarity, accuracy with little to no evidence of proofreading or attempt at applying proper writing mechanics. Range: 0 – 3.4	Score of Writing Clarity & Mechanics, / 5
APA Citation format Usage	10 points Posts contain the appropriate APA intext citations with Reference list in proper format. No errors are present. Range: 9 – 10	8.9 points Attempts intext citations and Reference list but some errors in formatting exist; paraphrasing is not accurate or in-text citations are omitted where citations are warranted. Range: .8 – 8.9	7.9 points Attempts intext citations or Reference list but omits one or the other. Intext citations or Reference list reflect significant errors or citations omitted where citations are warranted. Range: 7 – 7.9	6.9 points No evidence of APA usage. Range 0 – 6.9	Score of APA Citation format Usage, / 10
Adheres to Instructions	5 points Fully follows instructions; completes all required parts of the Learning Activity. Range: .4.5 -5	4.4 points Follows most, instructions, and/or attempts most required parts of the Learning Activity. Range:4 – 4.4	3.9 points Follows some instructions but completes all critical parts of Learning Activity. Range: .3.5 – 3.9	3.4 points Fails to follow instructions and, as a result, fails to complete required parts of Learning Activity. Range: 0 – 3.4	Score of Adheres to Instructions, / 5

Criteria

Outstanding

Above Standards

Meets Standards

Approaching or Does not meet Standards

Criterion Score

Learning Activity Analysis

30 points

Demonstrates critical analysis, in-depth and comprehensive development of concepts, accurately identifies all issues and their application to facts.

Shows clear evidence of having read course materials and applying them to support conclusions.

Range: 27 – 30

26.9 points

Demonstrates generally superior critical analysis, relatively in-depth and comprehensive development of concepts, accurately identifies most -not all – issues and their application to facts.

Some evidence of having read course materials and applying them to support conclusions.

Additional development and more comprehensive analysis needed.

Range: 24 – 26.9

23.9 points

Demonstrates some to minimal critical analysis and insight into concepts and issues, and their application to facts.

Analysis is largely superficial in one/more areas and sufficient only to meet minimum requirements of learning activity with little evidence of insight and/or support for conclusions.

Range: 21 – 23.9

20.9 points

Does not meet minimal requirements for assignment.

Little to no critical analysis, comprehensive development of concepts and issues and their application to facts.

Little to no support for conclusions.

Inferior in all areas.

To a substantial degree, content does not reflect students own original thinking and composition.

Range: 0 – 20.9

Score of Learning Activity Analysis,

/ 30

Writing Clarity & Mechanics

5 points

Demonstrates clear, organized, specific comments presented in an easy to read style that is free of grammatical, spelling, and mechanical errors.

Range: 4.5 -5

4.4 points

Demonstrates generally clear, organized, specific comments with minor errors in grammar, and/or spelling, and or mechanics.

Range: 4 – 4.4

3.9 points

Demonstrates generally satisfactory clear, specific comments with errors in grammar, and/or spelling, and/or mechanics.

Range: 3.5 – 3.9

3.4 points

Presentation lacks organization, clarity, accuracy with little to no evidence of proofreading or attempt at applying proper writing mechanics.

Range: 0 – 3.4

Score of Writing Clarity & Mechanics,

/ 5

APA Citation format Usage

10 points

Posts contain the appropriate APA intext citations with Reference list in proper format. No errors are present.

Range: 9 – 10

8.9 points

Attempts intext citations and Reference list but some errors in formatting exist; paraphrasing is not accurate or in-text citations are omitted where citations are warranted.

Range: .8 – 8.9

7.9 points

Attempts intext citations or Reference list but omits one or the other. Intext citations or Reference list reflect significant errors or citations omitted where citations are warranted.

Range: 7 – 7.9

6.9 points

No evidence of APA usage.

Range 0 – 6.9

Score of APA Citation format Usage,

/ 10

Adheres to Instructions

5 points

Fully follows instructions; completes all required parts of the Learning Activity.

Range: .4.5 -5

4.4 points

Follows most, instructions, and/or attempts most required parts of the Learning Activity.

Range:4 – 4.4

3.9 points

Follows some instructions but completes all critical parts of Learning Activity.

Range: .3.5 – 3.9

3.4 points

Fails to follow instructions and, as a result, fails to complete required parts of Learning Activity.

Range: 0 – 3.4

Score of Adheres to Instructions,

/ 5

TotalScore of BMGT 380 Learning Activities =50) – Spring 2023 ORT,

/ 50

Overall Score

Requirements: 2 paragraphs per section

WRITE MY PAPER

Business Law Question

Week Three Learning Activity

General Instructions for Learning Activities

Tips for Formatting and Structuring Analysis:

Learning Activity: due 11:59 pm ET, Saturday

Instructions

REPORT

Rubric Name: BMGT 380 Learning Activities =50) – Spring 2023 ORT

Overall Score

Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply