Assessment 2 Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Pl…

For this assessment, you will create a 5-7 slide PowerPoint presentation about a population health improvement plan. You will then record a video of no more than five minutes presenting your PowerPoint.

Expand All

Introduction

Professional Context

Scenario

Your organization has created an initiative to improve one of the pervasive and chronic health concerns in the community. Some examples of possibilities for health improvement initiatives include type 2 diabetes, HIV, obesity, and communicable diseases. You will need to do your own research to gather and evaluate the relevant data for your chosen issue.

Once you have created a presentation for the initiative, you have been asked to present to a group of community stakeholders. The purpose of your presentation is to inform and enlist support for the initiative from your audience.

Instructions

Download Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan Presentation Template [PPTX]

Submission Requirements

What to Submit

Competencies Measured

Scoring Guide

Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

Collapse All

Criterion 1

Evaluate the environmental and epidemiological data about your community to determine a population-focused priority for care.

Distinguished

Evaluates the environmental and epidemiological data about your community to determine a population-focused priority for care. Support you evaluation with specific reference to professional best-practices or scholarly sources.

Proficient

Evaluates the environmental and epidemiological data about your community to determine a population-focused priority for care.

Basic

Describes environmental and epidemiological data about a community in an incomplete manner, leading to a flawed diagnosis of a population-focused priority for care.

Non Performance

Does not describe environmental and epidemiological data about a community.

Criterion 2

Develop an ethical health improvement plan with outcome criteria that addresses the population health priority for care identified in the evaluation.

Distinguished

Develops an ethical health improvement plan with outcome criteria that addresses the population health issue identified in the evaluation. Specifically notes environmental realities and challenges existing in the community, potential barriers or misunderstandings related to various cultures prevalent in the community, and why proposed criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success.

Proficient

Develops an ethical health improvement plan with outcome criteria that addresses the population health priority for care identified in the evaluation.

Basic

Describes an ethical health improvement plan. However, the description is either missing the outcome criteria or the criteria are not relevant to population health priority for care identified or described health improvement plan.

Non Performance

Does not describe an ethical health improvement plan.

Criterion 3

Explain a plan to collaborate with a specific community organization to support the implementation of the population health improvement in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way.

Distinguished

Explains a plan to collaborate with a specific community organization to support the implementation of the population health improvement in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way. Notes specific strategies to allow for a respectful exchange of ideas and insights with the community organization. Specifically notes relevant community stakeholders, relevant, how communication will be mindful of data privacy and help make complex medical terms understandable to community members regardless of language, disabilities, or level of education.

Proficient

Explains a plan to collaborate with a specific community organization to support the implementation of the population health improvement in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way.

Basic

Explains a communication strategy that falls short of being ethical, culturally sensitive, or inclusive.

Non Performance

Does not explain a strategy for communicating with community stakeholders and community members in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way.

Criterion 4

Explain the value and relevance of the evidence and technology resources used as the basis of a population health improvement plan

Distinguished

Explains the value and relevance of the evidence and technology resources used as the basis of a population health improvement plan. Supports the explanation with reference to specific professional best-practices and scholarly sources.

Proficient

Explains the value and relevance of the evidence and technology resources used as the basis of a population health improvement plan.

Basic

Provides a weak or flawed explanation of the value or relevance of resources used as the basis of a population health improvement plan.

Non Performance

Does not explain the value and relevance of resources used as the basis of a population health improvement plan.

Criterion 5

Communicates the Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan in a professional, effective manner that engages the community organization stakeholders and the community-at large to implement and sustain change.

Distinguished

Communicates the Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan in a professional, effective manner that engages the community organization stakeholders and the community-at large to implement and sustain change. Provides specific actions that the community stakeholders can take themselves to help provide a feeling of community ownership in the plan.

Proficient

Communicates the Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan in a professional, effective manner that engages the community stakeholders to implement and sustain change.

Basic

Communicates the Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan in a professional manner. The communication is unclear or disorganized, which limits the engagement of community stakeholders to implement and sustain change.

Non Performance

Does not communicate the Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan.

Criterion 6

Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Distinguished

Integrates relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to APA style of in-text citations and references.

Proficient

Integrates relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Basic

Integrates credible sources of evidence, but the sources used is not relevant or do not well support assertions. APA formatting of in-text citations and references is incorrect or inconsistent, detracting noticeably from good scholarship.

Non Performance

Does not integrate credible sources of evidence or apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.