Applied Clinical Anatomy

Dear,

I am seeking professional academic assistance with a full rewrite and substantive improvement of an anatomy essay that previously failed and is now being resubmitted. This is a high-stakes resubmission, and it is essential that the work is academically rigorous, clearly human-written, and fully compliant with university assessment standards.

1. Essay question and scope

Question:

Different research methods are required to understand human anatomy.

Discuss this statement by focusing on one anatomical area of your choice.

Word count:

4000 words (excluding references)

Discipline:

Applied human clinical anatomy

2. Module aims and learning outcomes (must be explicitly met)

The rewritten essay must clearly demonstrate alignment with the following:

Module aim

• Application of anatomical sciences to applied anatomical knowledge and clinical skills.

Learning outcomes (all must be addressed explicitly and critically):

• Critical awareness of current theories underpinning applied human anatomical structure and function
• Understanding of human dissection techniques and other anatomical research methods, with critical evaluation of their strengths and limitations
• Analysis of how clinical anatomy informs professional and clinical practice
• Critical evaluation of current research and advanced scholarship in human anatomy

The essay must not be descriptive. It must be analytical, critical, and evaluative throughout.

3. Context: why this is a resubmission

My original submission received 48% (fail). The examiner raised serious academic concerns, including:

• Significant problems with referencing
• At least 22 cited articles that do not exist
• Writing style flagged as showing possible AI involvement

Because of this, the rewritten essay must be treated as a fresh academic piece, not a light edit.

4. What I need you to do (very important)

I am asking for:

• A complete rewrite, not paraphrasing
• A clear, human academic voice consistent with postgraduate/upper-undergraduate anatomy work
• Only real, verifiable academic sources (peer-reviewed journals, standard anatomy texts, authoritative reviews)
• Accurate in-text citations that match the reference list exactly
• No fabricated, unverifiable, or obscure references
• Logical structure with a strong introduction, critical main sections, and a well-reasoned conclusion

Please assume the essay will be scrutinised carefully for academic integrity, so clarity, transparency, and scholarly tone are essential.

5. Use of research methods (core of the essay)

The essay must clearly compare and critically evaluate different research methods used to understand the chosen anatomical area, for example:

• Cadaveric dissection
• Imaging techniques (e.g. MRI, CT, ultrasound)
• Histology and microscopy
• Biomechanical or functional studies
• Clinical/surgical anatomy evidence

Each method should be discussed in terms of:

• What anatomical knowledge it provides
• Its limitations and biases
• Why multiple methods are necessary for full anatomical understanding

6. Supporting materials

I have provided:

• A model essay (on the aortic valve) for structural guidance only
• My failed essay
• The similarity report and examiner feedback

These are reference materials only. The final essay must be original, not derivative.

7. Non-negotiable requirements

• The work must be entirely human-written
• No AI-generated text or fabricated references
• Clear academic argumentation and critical engagement
• Suitable for resubmission after a fail

This resubmission is extremely important for my progression, and I am looking for a writer who understands both academic anatomy and assessment expectations.

Please let me know:

• Your experience with anatomy or biomedical writing
• How you ensure referencing accuracy
• Your process for producing original academic work

Thank you for your time and consideration.