Choose 2 discussion questions from the list of prompts below and use content from the lectures and readings to answer them. Also, include evidence from at least two of the videos on the to support your answers.
b. Write one to two paragraphs in response to each discussion question that you select. Provide examples of research findings, legal cases, or other evidence to support your responses. Each paragraph should have at least 4 to 5 sentences.
c. Write a response to 2 of your classmates discussion posts that will stimulate debate; feel free to post supporting- or counter-arguments that are based on facts from research, legal cases, or policy decisions.
Be sure to proofread your response for errors in spelling, capitalization, punctuation, and grammar. Provide APA formatted in-text citations and a list of references used to support your responses. Also, share links to videos from documentaries, news footage, or research articles that you used to support your discussion responses.
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS (Choose 2):
- In his dissenting opinion in Terry v. Ohio, Justice Douglas argued that the legal standard for a stop-and-frisk should be the same as the legal standard for an arrest. Do you agree or disagree with Justice Douglas? Explain.
- Several studies have found evidence of racial disparities in stop-and-frisk practices. What is the legal definition of racial profiling? What can courts and/or police departments do (if anything) to reduce racial disparities in stop-and-frisk practices? Explain and give examples.
- What is the legal significance of Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Circuit? Do you agree or disagree with the outcome of the case? Explain.
Requirements: 2-4 paragraphs
Get this or a similar paper done in as fast as 4 hours, 24/7.
NB: We do not sell prewritten papers. All essays are written from scratch according to specific needs and instructions
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.