Answer either A or B below:
A) How does the modern CJ system acknowledge legal insanity? Is this an effective way to handle these issues? Is it an appropriate balance between individual rights and public order concerns?
B) Should so-called “procedural defenses” result in findings of not guilty and dismissal of charges? Is it due process for someone who could otherwise be proven guilty of offenses “get off” on a technicality?

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.