answer the questions below do not use ai i will check. this is based off the book what is the border by manilio graziano. pages 9-56. Write and explain in simple wording do not use difficult or fancy vocabulary or ill make you redo it. According to Manlio Graziano, ancient and early medieval empires had borders but they fluctuated a lot depending on military control. Modern borders–lines on maps that separate sovereign nation-states–are really a product of the Peace of Westphalia in 1648. This treaty ended the wars (roughly) between Catholics and Protestants with the principle of cuius regio, eius religio (“whatever prince, his religion”). This means that each ruler had the right to establish their religion as that of all their subjects, which meant that there had to be clear borders between national territories.
Graziano calls this the “nationality principle,” that borders are supposed to separate people into distinct national groups with different languages and cultures? Does this always work as advertised? Why or why not? Offer your thoughts in a couple of sentences in a new thread.
Graziano also speaks of “cosmopolitanism,” where people are first citizens of the world rather than of a nation-state. Can people really be first and foremost “citizens of the world”? Why or why not? Offer your thoughts in a couple of sentences in that same thread below.
Requirements: 2 short paragraphs
Get this or a similar paper done in as fast as 4 hours, 24/7.
NB: We do not sell prewritten papers. All essays are written from scratch according to specific needs and instructions
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.