AI-Enhanced Quality Analysis and Assurance Evaluation

Project Revive LLC AI-Driven Quality Turnaround Strategy

As a consultant with Project Revive LLC, you will analyze and manage a failed project from NearlyFree.com, which originally aimed to develop and deploy an AI-powered web-based training system for new employees.

You will conduct an AI-enhanced quality analysis to:

• Evaluate quality management failures and their impact on project success.
• Identify key quality assurance gaps and propose AI-driven process improvements.
• Develop an AI-enhanced quality assurance plan for successful project recovery.

Conduct an AI-Enhanced Quality Analysis of the Failed Project

Using AI-powered quality management tools, you will:

• Analyze the quality assurance plan of the failed project and its compliance with quality standards.
• Evaluate AI-driven quality control solutions that could have mitigated project failures.
• Use predictive analytics to assess project risks and suggest process improvements.

Key Analysis Areas

• Evaluate quality standards applied in the failed project and identify gaps.
• Analyze the product quality using AI-driven defect detection and compliance tracking tools.
• Recommend additional AI-powered quality standards to improve future project outcomes.

Develop an AI-Powered Quality Assurance Plan for the Turnaround Project

To convince NearlyFree.com management that the new employee orientation (NEO) project turnaround will be successful, develop an AI-driven QA plan that includes:

• AI-powered defect detection mechanisms for proactive issue identification.
• Automated compliance tracking using machine learning models.
• AI-driven root cause analysis to prevent recurring quality issues.
• A cost of quality (COQ) analysis integrating AI-enhanced quality cost optimization models.

Key Deliverables

• Develop a new AI-powered quality assurance plan for planned and systematic activities.
• Explain how AI-enhanced quality assurance tools support project quality and optimize efficiency.
• Assess the long-term impact of AI-driven quality management solutions on future project outcomes.

AI-Powered Quality Management Enhancements

Use AI-driven tools to:

• Automate quality control processes and reduce manual errors.
• Utilize machine learning for predictive defect detection and quality improvement.
• Enhance real-time quality monitoring with AI-powered dashboards.
• Implement AI-based process automation for QA workflows.

Added from Professor:

Paper Structure + Tips

• Include a formal title page
• Provide a brief project scope summary
• Body of the Paper
• Use section sub-headings aligned to the Unit 6 Scoring Guide, it will help keep your writing focused and organized.
• Remember, the assignment has two major parts
• Part 1 Quality Plan Analysis
• Put on your detective hat!
• Analyze the failed project by:
• Reviewing the quality standards that were defined
• Evaluating product quality based on those standards
• Recommending additional or improved quality standards
• Part 2 Quality Assurance Plan
• Your mission: Convince NearlyFree.com leadership that the NEO project can succeed! Show how youd turn it around by:
• Creating a Cost of Quality (COQ) analysis
• Developing a new Quality Assurance Plan (planned + systematic activities)
• Explaining how this QA plan improves project quality
• Considering how quality will be supported throughout the project lifecycle
• Stepping into the shoes of the project manager
• Wrap-Up End your paper with:
• A summary of key points
• Lessons learned or challenges encountered
• Areas for future research
• References (APA formatted)

Week 6 Assignment: AI-Enhanced Quality Analysis and Assurance EvaluationCriteriaRatingsPtsAnalyze quality standards of a failed project.

27.2 to >23.12 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Evaluates product quality based on quality standards; describes gaps and opportunities for improvement.

23.12 to >19.04 pts

PROFICIENT

Analyzes quality standards of a failed project.

19.04 to >0 pts

BASIC

Describes quality standards applicable to the failed project.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not describe quality standards applicable to the failed project.

/ 27.2 pts

Analyze the product quality using the selected quality standards.

27.2 to >23.12 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Analyzes the product quality using the selected quality standards related to materials, product components, production services, and inspection.

23.12 to >19.04 pts

PROFICIENT

Analyzes the product quality using the selected quality standards.

19.04 to >0 pts

BASIC

Identifies the quality standards, but does not analyze the product quality according to those standards.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not analyze the product quality using the selected quality standards.

/ 27.2 pts

Recommend additional quality standards for the turnaround project.

27.2 to >23.12 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Recommends additional quality standards for the turnaround project and provides rationale.

23.12 to >19.04 pts

PROFICIENT

Recommends additional quality standards for the turnaround project.

19.04 to >0 pts

BASIC

Recommends additional quality standards, but includes standards that are not relevant to the project.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not recommend quality standards.

/ 27.2 pts

Analyze the quality assurance plan for a failed project.

27.2 to >23.12 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Analyzes a quality assurance plan; examines and explains how the quality assurance plan supports quality throughout the project.

23.12 to >19.04 pts

PROFICIENT

Analyzes the quality assurance plan for a failed project.

19.04 to >0 pts

BASIC

Describes the quality assurance plan for a failed project.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not analyze the quality assurance plan for a failed project.

/ 27.2 pts

Develop a new quality assurance plan for planned and systematic activities.

25.6 to >21.76 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Develops a new, comprehensive quality assurance plan for planned and systematic activities; addresses processes, metrics, and documentation in the plan.

21.76 to >17.92 pts

PROFICIENT

Develops a new quality assurance plan for planned and systematic activities.

17.92 to >0 pts

BASIC

Describes how the new quality assurance plan can support project quality.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not develop a new quality assurance plan for planned and systematic activities.

/ 25.6 pts

Prepare a cost of quality (COQ) analysis.

25.6 to >21.76 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Prepares a cost of quality (COQ) analysis using a common method and relevant data, such as prevention cost, appraisal cost, internal failure cost, and external failure cost; explains analysis method, data, and implications.

21.76 to >17.92 pts

PROFICIENT

Prepares a cost of quality (COQ) analysis.

17.92 to >0 pts

BASIC

Prepares a cost (COQ) analysis. but does not complete the analysis using a common method or relevant data.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does prepare a cost (COQ) analysis.

/ 25.6 pts