he Book for this assessment is please let me know if you can or cannot find a copy as the information we will be writing about will require this book: Khan, Shamus, Patrick Sharkey, and Gwen Sharp. 2024. A Sociology Experiment, 3rd Edition
aper
1. Formatting & Technicals (Non-Negotiable)
- Length: You must write at least 2.5 full pages, but do not exceed 3 pages. Anything less than 2.5 pages loses points immediately.
- The Header: Put the name James Biney in the “Header” section of the Word document (double-click the very top of the page). It must be “outside” the main body margin. Do not include the date, professor name, or class title.
- Title: Do not use “Social Structure Essay.” Create something creative like The Invisible Architecture: Navigating My Status Set in Modern Society.
- Font: 12-point, double-spaced.
2. The Thesis Paragraph (5 Points)
- Requirement: Do not just “introduce” the topic. You must provide a clear roadmap.
- Instruction: Write a paragraph that explicitly states you will be analyzing your ascribed and achieved statuses, the dilemma of the master status, the internal dynamics of a specific social institution, and the inevitable role conflicts that arise from these structures.
3. Definitions and Citations (Crucial for 40+ Points)
- Instruction: For every sociological term (Ascribed Status, Achieved Status, Master Status, Social Group, Social Role, Role Conflict), you must:
- Provide a formal definition.
- Include an in-text citation from the textbook: (Author, pg#). Note: Even if you paraphrase, you must cite the page number to hit the “Highly Competent” criteria.
4. Content Breakdown for “Highly Competent” Marks
Ascribed & Achieved Status (10 Points)
- Define both with citations.
- Provide at least three (3) clear examples of ascribed statuses (e.g., race, age, sex) and three (3) achieved statuses (e.g., college student, employee, athlete).
- Briefly explain why each fits the definition.
Master Status & The “Dilemma” (10 Points)
- Define Master Status with a citation.
- Identify yours.
- The Critical Part: You must discuss the “dilemma.” Contrast how you identify yourself versus how society/others might implicitly label you. Explain the sociological importance of this gap (e.g., how it affects your life chances or social interactions).
Social Group & Roles (20 Points)
- Pick one specific institution (e.g., your University or your workplace).
- Identify the social positions (statuses) within it and the corresponding roles (the behaviors expected of those statuses).
- Instruction: You must explain the relationship between these roles. Don’t just list them; explain how they interact to make the institution function.
Role Conflict (10 Points)
- Define Role Conflict with a citation.
- Provide a “compelling” personal example. For instance, describe a time your role as a Student (needing to study for an exam) conflicted with your role as an Employee (being called into a shift) or a Family Member.
5. The “So-What” Conclusion (10 Points)
- Instruction: Do not just summarize the paper.
- Reframe your findings. Address the “sociological significance”: explain how understanding these structures changes how we view human interaction. Your “take-away” should be that social structure isn’t just a list of labels, but a framework that dictates the flow of our daily lives.
6. Final Polish (5 Points)
- Transitions: Ensure every paragraph flows logically into the next (e.g., moving from the individual “status” to the broader “institution”).
- Grammar: Zero run-on sentences or spelling errors.
- No Outside Sources: Use only the textbook. If you use Google for a definition, you will likely lose points for “outside resources.”

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.