530 topic 4 lastdb

Sternberg types of love was uploaded and its starts on page 295, additional peer reviewed scholarly resources within 8 years (2)

Part 1: Description of the Eight Types of Love

In a minimum of 250 words, briefly describe the eight types of love described by Sternberg (1988). Include a discussion of how the components of intimacy, passion, and commitment affect each type of love. Note that an outline format is appropriate for this section, but please write the information in your own words.

Part 2: Create a Case Conceptualization

Create a case conceptualization of 250-500 words involving a fictitious couple experiencing one of the eight types of love (but avoid consummate love as there are no inherent problems with complete love). Include a description of the relationship and some characteristics the couple exhibits. Do not use any personal information or information related to current cases you are working on.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Treatment

In a minimum of 250 words, provide an evidence-based treatment from a specific theoretical perspective that may be appropriate for this couple. Explain why this would be an appropriate treatment for the couple.

In addition to the textbook, please include a minimum of two scholarly sources to support your work

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Rubric Criteria

Part 1: Eight Types of Love

20 pointsCriteria Description

Part 1: Eight Types of Love

5. Excellent

20 points

Provides a thorough description of the eight types of love, including how intimacy, passion, and commitment affect each type. Student illustrates a clear understanding of the types and their defining characteristics.

4. Good

17.4 points

Provides a thorough description of the eight types of love, including how intimacy, passion, and commitment affect each type.

3. Satisfactory

15.8 points

Provides a cursory description of the eight types of love, including how intimacy, passion, and commitment affect each type.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

14.8 points

Describes the eight types of love, including how intimacy, passion, and commitment affect each type, but the information provided is inaccurate or irrelevant.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Does not describe the eight types of love, including how intimacy, passion, and commitment affect each type.

Part 2: Case Conceptualization

20 pointsCriteria Description

Part 2: Case Conceptualization

5. Excellent

20 points

Provides a thorough case conceptualization involving a fictitious couple experiencing one of the eight types of love, including the relationship and characteristics the couple exhibits. The type of love, relationship, and characteristics are adequately incorporated and clearly addressed. Student illustrates an advanced understanding of the type of love.

4. Good

17.4 points

Provides a thorough case conceptualization involving a fictitious couple experiencing one of the eight types of love, including the relationship and characteristics the couple exhibits. The type of love, relationship, and characteristics are adequately incorporated and clearly addressed.

3. Satisfactory

15.8 points

Provides a case conceptualization involving a fictitious couple experiencing one of the eight types of love, including the relationship and characteristics the couple exhibits. The type of love, relationship, and characteristics are briefly, but accurately incorporated into the case study.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

14.8 points

Provides a case conceptualization involving a fictitious couple experiencing one of the eight types of love, including the relationship and characteristics the couple exhibits, but the information provided in the case study is inaccurate or irrelevant to the type of love.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Does not create a case conceptualization involving a fictitious couple experiencing one of the eight types of love, including the relationship and characteristics the couple exhibits.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Treatments

16 pointsCriteria Description

Part 3: Evidence-Based Treatments

5. Excellent

16 points

Provides a thorough description of an evidence-based treatment from a specific theoretical perspective that could be used with the couple and why the treatment would be appropriate. Student illustrates a clear understanding of the types and their defining characteristics.

4. Good

13.92 points

Provides a thorough description of an evidence-based treatment from a specific theoretical perspective that could be used with the couple and why the treatment would be appropriate.

3. Satisfactory

12.64 points

Provides a cursory description of an evidence-based treatment from a specific theoretical perspective that could be used with the couple and why the treatment would be appropriate.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

11.84 points

Describes an evidence-based treatment from a specific theoretical perspective that could be used with the couple and why the treatment would be appropriate, but the information provided is inaccurate or irrelevant.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Does not include a description of an evidence-based treatment from a specific theoretical perspective that could be used with the couple and why the treatment would be appropriate.

Thesis Development and Purpose

5.6 pointsCriteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent

5.6 points

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. Good

4.87 points

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory

4.42 points

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

4.14 points

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction

6.4 pointsCriteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. Excellent

6.4 points

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Good

5.57 points

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory

5.06 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

4.74 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Mechanics of Writing

4 pointsCriteria Description

Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.

5. Excellent

4 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

3.48 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

3. Satisfactory

3.16 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

2.96 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Paper Format

4 pointsCriteria Description

Includes use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.

5. Excellent

4 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

4. Good

3.48 points

All format elements are correct.

3. Satisfactory

3.16 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

2.96 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

4 pointsCriteria Description

Includes citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.

5. Excellent

4 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

4. Good

3.48 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

3. Satisfactory

3.16 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

2.96 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total

80 points